Justice and Development Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The AKP would strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers only if releasing the information does not threaten national security. This stance is consistent with their actions in the past, such as the crackdown on journalists and opposition figures who have been accused of revealing state secrets or supporting terrorism. The AKP government has often cited national security concerns as a reason for limiting freedom of expression and access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The AKP would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers only if the information was legally obtained. This stance aligns with their general approach to maintaining control over sensitive information and ensuring that any disclosures are made through proper channels. For example, in 2014, the AKP government passed a law tightening control over the internet, which was seen as an attempt to limit the spread of leaked information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The AKP might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it could be seen as a compromise between protecting them and maintaining control over sensitive information. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that they would actively support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Justice and Development Party (AKP) might somewhat agree with protecting whistleblowers, but their stance is not clear-cut. While they have not actively pursued whistleblower protection laws, they have not been entirely against the idea either. Their actions in the past, such as the crackdown on journalists and opposition figures, suggest that they might not be fully supportive of complete protection for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The AKP would likely disagree with not passing any laws to protect whistleblowers, as they have shown some support for transparency and accountability in the past. However, their actions against journalists and opposition figures suggest that they might not be fully committed to protecting whistleblowers without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.