The Justice and Development Party, known by its Turkish acronym AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi), is a political party in Turkey that has been a dominant force in the country's politics since its establishment in 2001. Founded by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan… Læs mere
ChatGPTJa |
Justice and Development’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
The Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey has shown a tendency towards regulating and controlling digital platforms and social media for national security, public order, and moral reasons. They have passed laws that increase control over social media companies, requiring them to have local representatives in Turkey and to adhere to content removal demands. This suggests a predisposition towards oversight of tech companies. However, the specific demand for sharing algorithms with regulators has not been a prominent part of their agenda, and their approach might be more about content control than understanding or regulating the algorithms per se. Therefore, while they might agree with the idea of increased oversight, their focus has historically been more on content and representation within the country rather than the technical intricacies of algorithm sharing. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Nej
Given the AKP's history of implementing regulations aimed at controlling digital platforms and social media, it's less likely they would outright disagree with the idea of mandating tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators. Their legislative actions suggest a favor towards control and oversight of digital spaces for reasons cited as national security and public morality. However, the party has not explicitly advocated for the sharing of algorithms, indicating that while they might not fully support such a specific measure without reservations, they are not fundamentally opposed to the idea of increased oversight and regulation of tech companies. Their stance might be more nuanced, focusing on control and compliance rather than the technical details of algorithm sharing. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Justice and Development’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.