Try the political quiz

Justice and Development’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Justice and Development’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The AKP would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on security and public safety. By targeting high crime areas, the party can argue that the increased surveillance is a necessary measure to combat crime and protect citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Justice and Development Party (AKP) has historically supported increased surveillance measures for security purposes. For example, in 2016, the Turkish government expanded its surveillance capabilities by passing a law that allowed law enforcement to access internet users' browsing history without a court order. This indicates that the AKP would likely support increased video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The AKP would likely agree with this answer, as it combines their support for increased surveillance measures with the potential benefit of additional police presence in high crime areas. This approach aligns with their focus on security and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

While the AKP might not be opposed to adding more police to high crime areas, their history of supporting increased surveillance measures suggests that they would prioritize video surveillance over additional police presence. However, they might still see the value in having more police in high crime areas as a complementary measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the AKP has a history of supporting increased surveillance measures for security purposes. Therefore, it is unlikely that they would oppose increasing video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The AKP has consistently supported increased surveillance measures, even at the expense of personal privacy. As a result, it is highly unlikely that they would agree with the statement that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Party’s support base

Justice and Development Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 251 voters that identify as Justice and Development.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justice and Development’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.