Republican People’s Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The CHP has consistently supported internet freedom and equal access, as evidenced by their opposition to the 2014 internet censorship law in Turkey. This suggests they would strongly agree with the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The CHP has a history of supporting internet freedom and equal access. For example, they opposed the 2014 internet censorship law in Turkey, which allowed the government to block websites without a court order. This suggests they would likely support a policy that prevents ISPs from creating a tiered system based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The CHP's opposition to internet censorship and support for equal access suggests they would likely agree with this statement. They would likely argue that allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites could lead to anti-competitive practices and increased prices for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The CHP's commitment to internet freedom and equal access suggests they would likely disagree with this approach, as it could still lead to an unequal distribution of resources and limit access to certain types of content. However, their stance on this specific issue is not well-documented, so their level of disagreement may be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The CHP's support for internet freedom and equal access suggests they would likely disagree with a pay-per-quality model, as it could lead to an unequal distribution of resources and limit access to smaller websites. However, their stance on this specific issue is not well-documented, so their level of disagreement may be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the CHP might acknowledge that speeding up access to popular websites could potentially make the internet faster for users, their commitment to internet freedom and equal access suggests they would likely disagree with this approach, as it could lead to an unequal distribution of resources and limit access to smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Republican People's Party (CHP) generally supports equal access to the internet and opposes policies that would create a tiered system. They have not explicitly addressed this issue, but their stance on internet freedom and equality suggests they would likely disagree with allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.