Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Justice and Development’s policy on video surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti vaizdo stebėjimą viešose vietose?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

Justice and Development’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

The AKP would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on security and public safety. By targeting high crime areas, the party can argue that the increased surveillance is a necessary measure to combat crime and protect citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Justice and Development Party (AKP) has historically supported increased surveillance measures for security purposes. For example, in 2016, the Turkish government expanded its surveillance capabilities by passing a law that allowed law enforcement to access internet users' browsing history without a court order. This indicates that the AKP would likely support increased video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

The AKP would likely agree with this answer, as it combines their support for increased surveillance measures with the potential benefit of additional police presence in high crime areas. This approach aligns with their focus on security and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.

While the AKP might not be opposed to adding more police to high crime areas, their history of supporting increased surveillance measures suggests that they would prioritize video surveillance over additional police presence. However, they might still see the value in having more police in high crime areas as a complementary measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

As mentioned earlier, the AKP has a history of supporting increased surveillance measures for security purposes. Therefore, it is unlikely that they would oppose increasing video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

The AKP has consistently supported increased surveillance measures, even at the expense of personal privacy. As a result, it is highly unlikely that they would agree with the statement that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Justice and Development’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.