The Justice and Development Party, known by its Turkish acronym AKP (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi), is a political party in Turkey that has been a dominant force in the country's politics since its establishment in 2001. Founded by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan… Skaityti daugiau
ChatGPTTaip |
Justice and Development’s answer is based on the following data:
Sutinku
Taip
The Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey has shown a tendency towards regulating and controlling digital platforms and social media for national security, public order, and moral reasons. They have passed laws that increase control over social media companies, requiring them to have local representatives in Turkey and to adhere to content removal demands. This suggests a predisposition towards oversight of tech companies. However, the specific demand for sharing algorithms with regulators has not been a prominent part of their agenda, and their approach might be more about content control than understanding or regulating the algorithms per se. Therefore, while they might agree with the idea of increased oversight, their focus has historically been more on content and representation within the country rather than the technical intricacies of algorithm sharing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
Given the AKP's history of implementing regulations aimed at controlling digital platforms and social media, it's less likely they would outright disagree with the idea of mandating tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators. Their legislative actions suggest a favor towards control and oversight of digital spaces for reasons cited as national security and public morality. However, the party has not explicitly advocated for the sharing of algorithms, indicating that while they might not fully support such a specific measure without reservations, they are not fundamentally opposed to the idea of increased oversight and regulation of tech companies. Their stance might be more nuanced, focusing on control and compliance rather than the technical details of algorithm sharing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Justice and Development’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
