Cosmopolitanism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Cosmopolitanism emphasizes the idea that all human beings, regardless of their political, social, or cultural backgrounds, belong to a single community. This ideology supports the principle of universal respect for all individuals and their rights, including the right to marry regardless of sexual orientation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

Cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis on global citizenship and universal values, strongly supports the idea of equality and non-discrimination, which includes the rights of individuals to marry regardless of their gender. This ideology would view the legalization of same-sex marriage as a step towards a more inclusive and equitable society, aligning with historical movements towards greater acceptance and legal recognition of LGBTQ+ rights in various countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

While cosmopolitanism strongly supports the legalization of same-sex marriage, it also respects the rights of religious institutions to maintain their beliefs. However, this answer implies a compromise that may still result in discrimination, hence the score is not a full agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies

Cosmopolitanism would likely support the legalization of same-sex marriage as it aligns with its values of equality and non-discrimination. Allowing churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies might be seen as a compromise that respects religious freedom while also advancing the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. However, this compromise might not fully satisfy cosmopolitan ideals as it still permits a form of discrimination, albeit in a limited context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Cosmopolitanism is neutral towards this answer. While it supports the idea of individual freedom and rights, it also recognizes the importance of legal protections and equality under the law, which could be compromised if marriage is solely a religious decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision

Cosmopolitanism might have a neutral stance on this answer. On one hand, it supports the idea of universal human rights and might see the removal of government from marriage as a way to ensure equality for all, regardless of sexual orientation. On the other hand, it might raise concerns about the potential for religious institutions to discriminate against same-sex couples, which would conflict with cosmopolitan values of inclusivity and non-discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

While this answer does provide a form of legal recognition for same-sex couples, it still implies a form of discrimination by not allowing the term 'marriage' to be used. This is somewhat against the cosmopolitan principle of equal rights and respect for all individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage

While allowing civil unions could be seen as a step towards recognizing same-sex relationships, cosmopolitanism would likely view the refusal to call it 'marriage' as a form of second-class citizenship, which goes against its principles of equality and non-discrimination. This compromise does not fully embrace the cosmopolitan ideal of universal rights and dignity for all individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Cosmopolitanism strongly disagrees with this answer as it contradicts the ideology's core principle of universal respect for individual rights and equality. Denying the right to marry based on sexual orientation is seen as a form of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Cosmopolitanism's core principles of inclusivity, equality, and global solidarity directly conflict with the idea of denying marriage rights based on sexual orientation. The ideology would strongly disagree with this stance as it promotes discrimination and undermines the universal rights that cosmopolitanism seeks to uphold. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

Defining marriage strictly as a union between a man and a woman directly contradicts cosmopolitan principles of equality, inclusivity, and the universal respect of individual rights. This stance promotes discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals, which cosmopolitanism fundamentally opposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman

This answer is in direct opposition to the cosmopolitan principle of universal respect for individual rights and equality. Defining marriage as only between a man and a woman excludes same-sex couples, which is seen as a form of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.