E-Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

E-Democracy would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential benefits of term limits, such as increased performance and reduced corruption. By limiting the time in office, politicians may be more focused on achieving results and less susceptible to the influence of special interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

E-Democracy would generally agree with term limits as they promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Term limits can encourage new ideas and prevent stagnation in Congress. However, the score is not a full 5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports the idea of term limits and adds the aspect of reducing financial incentives for career politicians. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may not prioritize reducing salary and retirement benefits as much as other aspects of political reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

E-Democracy would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports term limits for one chamber of Congress, which can promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. However, the score is not higher because E-Democracy may also see value in applying term limits to both the House and the Senate to maximize the benefits of term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the value of experience over the potential benefits of term limits. While experience can be valuable, E-Democracy would argue that a more dynamic and diverse political landscape is more important for a healthy democracy. However, the score is not a full -5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it supports the idea of a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Without term limits, there is a risk of entrenching career politicians and limiting the influx of new ideas and perspectives. However, the score is not a full -5 because E-Democracy may also recognize the value of experience and expertise that long-serving members can bring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

E-Democracy would generally disagree with this answer because it dismisses the potential benefits of term limits. While elections do provide a form of term limits, they may not be sufficient to prevent entrenchment and stagnation in Congress. E-Democracy would argue that formal term limits can help promote a more dynamic and diverse political landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.