Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTYes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated
Reformism strongly supports government intervention to improve public health and safety. Mandatory vaccinations for preventable diseases, especially to protect vulnerable populations like young children, align with this ideology. This answer emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting those who cannot be vaccinated, which is a key public health concern for reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Reformism generally supports gradual improvements to society through government intervention. Mandatory vaccinations for preventable diseases align with this ideology, as they protect public health and reduce the spread of diseases. However, the score is not a full 5 because some reformists may advocate for exceptions based on religious or medical grounds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines
Reformism supports government intervention to improve public health, but also recognizes the importance of individual rights and freedoms. Allowing exceptions for religious beliefs is a compromise that respects individual choice while still promoting vaccination as a public health measure. This approach may appeal to reformists who seek a balance between government intervention and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases
Requiring vaccinations only for deadly contagious diseases is a more limited approach to government intervention in public health. While this policy would still protect against the most dangerous diseases, it may not go far enough for some reformists who believe in broader government intervention to improve public health and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school
Reformism seeks to improve society through government intervention, and requiring vaccinations for public school attendance is a moderate approach that balances individual freedom with public health concerns. This policy would encourage vaccination while still allowing for some personal choice, which may appeal to some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead
Funding public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits of vaccines is a less direct form of government intervention in public health. While this approach may raise awareness and encourage vaccination, it does not ensure that all children will be vaccinated against preventable diseases. Some reformists may support this approach as a first step, but it may not be seen as sufficient to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Regardless, this should be decided at the state level
Reformism does not inherently favor either centralized or decentralized decision-making, as its primary focus is on gradual improvements to society through government intervention. Whether vaccination policies should be decided at the state level would likely depend on the specific context and the views of individual reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children
Holding parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children is a punitive approach that may not align with the reformist goal of improving public health through government intervention. While this policy may deter some parents from refusing vaccinations, it does not directly promote vaccination and may be seen as overly harsh by some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Reformism typically supports government intervention to improve public health and safety. Not requiring vaccinations goes against this principle, as it could lead to the spread of preventable diseases and endanger public health. However, the score is not a full -5 because some reformists may advocate for exceptions based on religious or medical grounds.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
