Try the political quiz

Rights and Freedoms’ policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

RaF>RaF  ChatGPTNo

Rights and Freedoms’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree to some extent with this statement, as they would want to maintain the integrity of the political process and avoid potential corruption. However, they might also consider the nature of the crime and the individual's rehabilitation, hence the score is not extremely high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with their belief in rehabilitation and second chances. However, they would also likely have reservations due to the potential harm to the party's reputation and the potential for corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

While the Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree with the sentiment of maintaining the integrity of the political process, they might also consider this approach as potentially infringing on the rights of individuals who are under investigation but not yet convicted. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely have mixed feelings about this statement. On one hand, they would want to maintain the integrity of the political process, but on the other hand, they might consider that a crime not committed while in office could be less relevant to a politician's ability to serve. Therefore, they would likely neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely have mixed feelings about this statement. While they would agree with the sentiment of maintaining the integrity of the political process, they might also consider this approach as potentially infringing on the rights of individuals who have committed less serious crimes and have since rehabilitated. Therefore, they would likely neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Rights and Freedoms party, while advocating for civil liberties and democratic principles, would likely have reservations about allowing a politician with a criminal record to run for office. This is due to the potential harm to the party's reputation and the potential for corruption. However, the score is not extremely negative as they might consider the context of the crime and the individual's rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Rights and Freedoms’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.