True Path Party

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The DYP would likely agree with this statement, as they would be concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. They would want to ensure that the internet remains a level playing field for all businesses and users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The DYP might lean towards supporting equal access to the internet for all websites, as it promotes fair competition and prevents monopolistic practices. However, their stance might not be as strong as a more left-leaning party, as they still support free market policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The DYP would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. However, their support might not be as strong as a more left-leaning party, as they still support free market policies and might be open to some level of differentiation in service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The DYP might be open to the idea of giving priority by type, such as video over images, as it could improve the overall user experience. However, they would likely be cautious about allowing ISPs to prioritize based on the source of the content, as it could lead to unfair competition and limit the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The DYP's stance on a pay-per-quality model is unclear, as there are no specific historical examples or policy positions related to this issue. They might be open to considering such a model if it promotes fair competition and does not limit the openness of the internet, but their position would likely depend on the specific details of the proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the DYP might see the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet for users, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as limiting competition and creating an unfair advantage for larger websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The True Path Party (DYP) is a center-right political party in Turkey, which generally supports free market policies. However, they might not fully agree with the idea of speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of slowing down less popular ones, as it could lead to an unfair competitive advantage and limit the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.