RaF>RaF ChatGPTNe, tai leistų jiems pašalinti konkurenciją, sukurti dirbtinį trūkumą ir padidinti kainas |
Rights and Freedoms’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Ne, tai leistų jiems pašalinti konkurenciją, sukurti dirbtinį trūkumą ir padidinti kainas
This answer aligns with the party's stance on equality and fairness. They would likely strongly agree that allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to unfair competition and increased prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Ne, elgesys su visais srautais lygiai ir tęskite interneto atvirumą
The Rights and Freedoms party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their stance on equality and fairness. They would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Nr
The party's stance on equality and fairness would likely lead them to oppose any measures that could potentially create a digital divide or limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, bet suteikite pirmenybę pagal tipą (vaizdo įrašai virš vaizdų) ir ne pagal šaltinį (didelis tinklalapis virš mažo tinklalapio)
While this answer might seem more fair than simply speeding up access to popular websites, it still involves prioritizing certain types of content over others, which the Rights and Freedoms party might see as a form of discrimination or inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, tik jei tai griežtai pagrįsta mokėjimo už kokybę modeliu
While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair in theory, in practice it could still lead to a digital divide where those who can afford to pay more get better access. The Rights and Freedoms party would likely oppose this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip
The Rights and Freedoms party in Turkey is known for its advocacy for equal rights and freedoms for all citizens. They would likely oppose any measure that could potentially create a digital divide or limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip, tai padarytų internetą greitesnį ir patikimesnį vartotojams.
While the party might agree that faster and more reliable internet is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by potentially limiting access to less popular or less wealthy websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Rights and Freedoms’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.