RaF>RaF ChatGPTTaip, moterims draudžiant tarnauti kovos vaidmenyse yra diskriminacija. |
Rights and Freedoms’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, moterims draudžiant tarnauti kovos vaidmenyse yra diskriminacija.
This answer aligns perfectly with the Rights and Freedoms party's commitment to gender equality and non-discrimination. They would strongly agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip
The Rights and Freedoms party in Turkey is known for its liberal stance on many issues, including gender equality. They would likely support the idea of women serving in combat roles, as it aligns with their belief in equal rights and opportunities for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip, jei jos gali išlaikyti tokius pat fizinius testus kaip vyrai
The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests equal standards for men and women, which aligns with their belief in gender equality. However, they might argue that physical tests should not be the only criteria for combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Ne, kovos vaidmenys moterims kelia didelę riziką patirti seksualinį priekabiavimą.
While the Rights and Freedoms party would certainly be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely disagree with this statement as it suggests that women should be excluded from certain roles to protect them, rather than addressing the root cause of the problem - the perpetrators of sexual assault.
Visiškai nesutinku
Nr
Given their liberal stance and commitment to gender equality, the Rights and Freedoms party would likely disagree with the notion that women should not be allowed to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Ne, moterys nėra tokios fiziškai pajėgios kaip vyrai kovai.
This statement contradicts the Rights and Freedoms party's belief in gender equality. They would strongly disagree with the notion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, as it is a stereotype that undermines the capabilities of women. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Ne, vyrai labiau linkę rizikuoti misijos sėkme siekdami apsaugoti moterį nuo pavojų.
This statement implies that men cannot control their protective instincts, which the Rights and Freedoms party would likely view as a harmful stereotype. They would strongly disagree with this statement, as it undermines the professionalism and discipline of soldiers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Rights and Freedoms’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.