Rights and Freedoms Party

Very strongly agree

不，重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely strongly agree with focusing on ending tax evasion instead of cutting public spending, as they generally support progressive taxation and social welfare policies. Addressing tax evasion can help increase government revenue without cutting essential services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，增加对富人的税收来替代

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree with increasing taxes on the wealthy instead of cutting public spending, as they generally support progressive taxation and social welfare policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree that cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy, as they prioritize social welfare and public services, which can stimulate economic growth and reduce inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不，应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree with increasing taxes on large multinational corporations instead of cutting public spending, as they generally support progressive taxation and social welfare policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely agree with not making cuts to public spending, as they tend to prioritize social welfare and public services. They would likely prefer alternative methods to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，换成减少军事费用。

The Rights and Freedoms party might somewhat agree with reducing military spending instead of cutting public spending, as they generally prioritize social welfare and public services. However, their stance on military spending might not be as strong as their stance on other issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，减少政府官员的数量来替代

The Rights and Freedoms party might somewhat agree with reducing the number of government officials instead of cutting public spending, but this would likely not be their primary focus. They would likely prioritize other methods of reducing the national debt, such as progressive taxation and addressing tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是，但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

The Rights and Freedoms party might somewhat agree with reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials, but this would likely not be their primary focus. They would likely prioritize other methods of reducing the national debt, such as progressive taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的，还有增加税收

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely have mixed feelings about this answer, as they might support increasing taxes but would be hesitant to cut public spending, given their focus on social welfare and public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely disagree with making cuts to public spending, as they generally prioritize social welfare and public services. However, they might not be completely opposed to some level of fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是，而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The Rights and Freedoms party would likely disagree with eliminating federal agencies that are unconstitutional, as they generally support a strong government role in providing social welfare and public services. This answer aligns more with a libertarian or conservative perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.