Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
E>E Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
E>E Personal answer不,但要求要上公立学校的学生做疫苗接种 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
E>E Personal answerNo, we should be investing in making treatment/rehab more accessible and affordable for those who are lower income. Education programs and job programs too. We need to focus our efforts on truly helping those with addiction. NOT enabling and NOT imprisonment. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
E>E Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
经济 › 关税
E>E Personal answer是的,这将有助于创造和保留更多就业机会 |
环境 › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
E>E Personal answer应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
E>E Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
E>E Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
E>E Personal answer不 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
E>E Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
E>E Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
E>E Personal answer是,但应当使用电子手铐将他们软禁在家 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
E>E Personal answer不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源 |
移民 › 双重国籍
E>E Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
E>E Personal answer是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
移民 › 公民考试
E>E Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
移民 › 移民同化
E>E Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 工会
E>E Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
E>E Personal answerI don’t know |
经济 › 经济刺激
E>E Personal answerYes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only. Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan. |
经济 › 比特币
E>E Personal answer是的,但它不应该取代我们国库支持的货币 |
经济 › 公司税
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
移民 › 技术移民
E>E Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
社会 › 堕胎
E>E Personal answer主张堕胎合法,提供节育、性教育以及更多社会服务能帮助减少堕胎数量 |
经济 › 税
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
国内政策 › 任期限制
E>E Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
E>E Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
E>E Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
E>E Personal answer增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利 |
医保 › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerThis is not an easy answer, but here goes. Law enforcement should have nationally standardized basic education requirements which states can expound on but not reduce. This education should cover and emphasize de-escalation, comprehensive basic sociology(including racial and gender equality), psychology, abnormal psychology, crisis/conflict resolution, basic medical/first aid, as well as the current tactical training they already receive. In whole academies should be much longer than the 9 week national average. Make a national certification test for academy graduates must pass before entering full time service. Mandate psychological evaluation and background checks before allowing entry into academies. Periodic psychological check ups and mandated independent counseling after high intensity events or when complaint investigations determine that the officer is operating outside of department guidelines. Limit unions abilities to shield officers that repeatedly violate policy and have zero tolerance policies for class B misdemeanor offences and higher. And cannot allow departments to rehire officers with out some sort of reconciliation or rehabilitation. We as a society expect a lot from local law enforcement. We either need to give them the tools they need to do all the things we think they should do, as an attempt to limit the risk of bodily damage or death to themselves and civilians. Or we limit the scope of what they do and employ other types of officers that handle non violent, non criminal activity. Communities need to get together with city and state officials at like an ongoing round-table to communicate the communities needs and concerns; then adjust action plans to best meet them. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.