Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
A>A Personal answer不应该,请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
A>A Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
医保 › 精神健康
A>A Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
A>A Personal answer无论如何,这应该是州一级政府的决定。 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
A>A Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
社会 › LGBT收养权
A>A Personal answerYes, They should have rights to do so but I personally disagree with homosexuality |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
A>A Personal answer是的,但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
A>A Personal answer不应该,判处他们终身监禁,且不得假释 |
医保 › 安全港
A>A Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
A>A Personal answer不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
A>A Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
社会 › 安乐死
A>A Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
A>A Personal answer不是,除非他们合法地进入此国家 |
环境 › Animal Testing
A>A Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
A>A Personal answer应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
A>A Personal answer是的,但是只在服完他们的刑期和缓刑之后 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
A>A Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
A>A Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
A>A Personal answer不 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
A>A Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
A>A Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
A>A Personal answer是,但应当使用电子手铐将他们软禁在家 |
环境 › 水力压裂法
A>A Personal answer是的,但是要加大监督力度 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
A>A Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
移民 › 双重国籍
A>A Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
经济 › 政府支出
A>A Personal answer不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
A>A Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
移民 › 公民考试
A>A Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
A>A Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
A>A Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
移民 › 移民同化
A>A Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
A>A Personal answer不,这将鼓励人们不工作,并对经济增长带来伤害 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
A>A Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
经济 › 工会
A>A Personal answer理论上是有帮助的,但最近腐败现象太多,应该限制其权力 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
A>A Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
A>A Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
A>A Personal answer应该,但是要为那些结果为阳性的人提供治疗办法 |
经济 › 经济刺激
A>A Personal answer是的,但是使用对所有公民减税的形式。 |
经济 › 公司税
A>A Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
移民 › 技术移民
A>A Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
社会 › 堕胎
A>A Personal answer反对堕胎,但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
A>A Personal answer不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
A>A Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
A>A Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
经济 › 社会福利
A>A Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
A>A Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
医保 › World Health Organization
A>A Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
A>A Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
A>A Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
A>A Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.