Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
WP>WP Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
WP>WP Personal answerWhile all people should vaccinate, I do not think getting the government involved would be a good solution, as it does go against people's rights, in a sense. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
WP>WP Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
科学 › 核能
WP>WP Personal answerRepeal the Price-Anderson Act in order to require that nuclear power companies have full liability for any accidents. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
WP>WP Personal answerRegardless, leave it to adoption agencies to choose which couples to prioritize |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
WP>WP Personal answerYes, unless it creates a security threat |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
WP>WP Personal answerIf it is a non-violent crime, the death penalty should not be an option |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
WP>WP Personal answerNo, let the private companies and consumers decide. |
社会 › 安乐死
WP>WP Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
经济 › 关税
WP>WP Personal answerOnly on products from nations that violate our trade laws |
环境 › Animal Testing
WP>WP Personal answerNo, instead use voluntary humans for testing |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
WP>WP Personal answerNo, but all citizens, including women, should be eligible for the draft, and benefits for soldiers, reservists, and guardsmen should be incresed. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
WP>WP Personal answerIf the foreigner is here legally and has filed to become a US Citizen, then they should get to vote, ONLY IF THEY'RE IN THE PROCESS OF BECOMING A US CITIZEN ALREADY. |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
WP>WP Personal answerNo, only voters should be allowed to finance political campaigns. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
WP>WP Personal answerYes, if it can be proved they are monopolies and detrimental to american society |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
WP>WP Personal answerNo, this system is too expensive and the government should not be involved in healthcare. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
WP>WP Personal answerYes, and abolish all victimless crimes (drug use, seatbelt laws, etc.) as well. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
WP>WP Personal answerThe free market should make that decision. |
移民 › 双重国籍
WP>WP Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
WP>WP Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
经济 › 国内工作
WP>WP Personal answerNo. Everyone, and businesses, need a good, healthy tax cut across the board. Outsourcing should be heavily discouraged, but as we live in a capitalist, free-market society, let the people vote with their wallets. |
外交政策 › 外国选举
WP>WP Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
经济 › 政府支出
WP>WP Personal answerYes, and end the federal reserve to reduce the issuing of more debt |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
WP>WP Personal answerYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, as long as the crime was not committed while in office and as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
WP>WP Personal answerThat should be left totally to the discretion of those private companies. |
移民 › 公民考试
WP>WP Personal answerYes, but they can alternatively serve in the military to earn their citizenship. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
WP>WP Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
移民 › 移民同化
WP>WP Personal answerNo, they should have a choice but it should be heavily recommended, seeing as it is our countries main language. |
经济 › 政府养老金
WP>WP Personal answerNo, they should be transitioned into privately managed accounts |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
WP>WP Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
WP>WP Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
WP>WP Personal answerRegardless, we should end all social programs and leave it to the private sector and charities. This would bring communities together to support great causes and will weed out the ones that have taken advantage of government handouts. |
经济 › 经济刺激
WP>WP Personal answerNo, unless the stimulus programs consist only of lowering the tax rates and raising the standard deduction |
经济 › 公司税
WP>WP Personal answerLower, but focus first on lowering the tax rates for small businesses as top priority so competition and economic opportunity can thrive. |
移民 › 技术移民
WP>WP Personal answerIncrease, and also make it easier for skilled immigrants to get citizenship. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
WP>WP Personal answerNo, we already have term limits called "elections", but after leaving Congress, their salary stops and retirement benefits can be continued if an individual pays for it on their own. Also, the ability to recall national elected officials needs to be made. Not just state & local governments. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
WP>WP Personal answerLow risk countries should be prioritized, but immigration should be more based more on individual discrimination and evaluation of persons. |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
WP>WP Personal answerWe should promote and highlight democracy on Hong Kong and encourage China to take notice |
经济 › 社会福利
WP>WP Personal answerNeither, they should be regulated to an amount that supplements income rather than replacing it, with the exception of certain demographics (mentally ill, elderly, etc.) |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
WP>WP Personal answerYes, but disallow for corporations and business organizations. |
医保 › World Health Organization
WP>WP Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
WP>WP Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.